<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="ru" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2409-1634</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Research result. Economic Research</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2409-1634</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18413/2409-1634-2021-7-4-0-3</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">2593</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>branch and regional economy</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Development of a scientifically grounded concept&amp;nbsp;for managing the economic security of the region</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Development of a scientifically grounded concept&amp;nbsp;for managing the economic security of the region</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Kislay</surname><given-names>Tatyana Nikolaevna</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Kislay</surname><given-names>Tatyana Nikolaevna</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>sauertat@gmail.com</email></contrib></contrib-group><pub-date pub-type="epub"><year>2021</year></pub-date><volume>7</volume><issue>4</issue><fpage>0</fpage><lpage>0</lpage><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="/media/economic/2021/4/Экономические_исследования-24-31.pdf" /><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Today, the development of a scientifically based concept of economic security management at the territorial level is facing serious difficulties. The generally accepted economic paradigm no longer makes it possible to effectively investigate, for example, such a socio-economic phenomenon as economic security. The evolution of methods of economic territorial research is influenced by the development of economic thought. The purpose of the study is to generalize the theoretical material on the research topic and to select the most promising modern paradigm concept of managing the economic security of the region. The author analyzes the problems of using the &amp;quot;Adam Smith&amp;quot; paradigm and draws conclusions about the expediency of using the evolutionary economic paradigm. This will allow, among other things, to consider the economic system of the region as self-developing. To develop an adequate concept of managing the economic security of the region, it is proposed to use the human-centered principle. As a result, the use of the quality of life of the population as an estimated indicator of the level of economic security of the region is yustified.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Today, the development of a scientifically based concept of economic security management at the territorial level is facing serious difficulties. The generally accepted economic paradigm no longer makes it possible to effectively investigate, for example, such a socio-economic phenomenon as economic security. The evolution of methods of economic territorial research is influenced by the development of economic thought. The purpose of the study is to generalize the theoretical material on the research topic and to select the most promising modern paradigm concept of managing the economic security of the region. The author analyzes the problems of using the &amp;quot;Adam Smith&amp;quot; paradigm and draws conclusions about the expediency of using the evolutionary economic paradigm. This will allow, among other things, to consider the economic system of the region as self-developing. To develop an adequate concept of managing the economic security of the region, it is proposed to use the human-centered principle. As a result, the use of the quality of life of the population as an estimated indicator of the level of economic security of the region is yustified.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>paradigm</kwd><kwd>concept</kwd><kwd>management</kwd><kwd>economic security</kwd><kwd>region</kwd><kwd>life quality</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>paradigm</kwd><kwd>concept</kwd><kwd>management</kwd><kwd>economic security</kwd><kwd>region</kwd><kwd>life quality</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>Список литературы</title><ref id="B1"><mixed-citation>1.&amp;nbsp;Blaug Mark (2004). Metodologya ekonomicheskoi nauki, ili Kak ekonomisty obyasnyayut. Transl. from Enlish. Nauch. red. i vstup. st. V.S. Avtonomova. M., NP &amp;laquo;Zhurnal Voprosy ekonomiki&amp;raquo;, 416 p. (in Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><mixed-citation>2.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Vasil&amp;#39;kova V.V. (1999). Poryadok i khaos v razvitii sotsialnykh sistem: sinergetika i teorya sotsialnoy samoorganizacii. SPb., Lan&amp;#39;, 480 p. (Mir kul&amp;#39;tury, istorii i filosofii) URL: http://www.phantastike.com/link/social_psychology/poryadok_i_ haos _v _ razvitii_ soc.zip. (in Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><mixed-citation>3.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Granberg A.G. (2000). Osnovy regional&amp;#39;noy ekonomiki. M., GU VShJe, &amp;ndash; 584 p. (in Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><mixed-citation>4.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Kardash V.A. O neizbezhnoy smene paradigmy v ekonomicheskoi nauke (2009). Eekonomichesky vestnik Rostovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Vol.7, 1: 51&amp;ndash;57. (in Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><mixed-citation>5.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Kirdina S.G. (2007). Modeli ekonomiki v raznyh paradigmah: neoklassicheskoy, neinstitucional&amp;#39;noy, evolyucionnoy i samoorganizacionnoy. URL: https://refdb.ru/look/2612759-pall.html. (in Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><mixed-citation>6.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Kun T. (1977). Struktura nauchnyh revolyutsy. 2-e izd. Transl. from EnglishI.Z. Naletova; obshh. red. D. Mikulenskogo. M., Progress, 300 p. Pp. 129-187. URL: http://www.biometrica.tomsk.ru/Kuhn.pdf. (in Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><mixed-citation>7.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Martishin E.M. (2011). Sovremennye ekonomicheskie paradigmy i razvitie ekonomicheskoi teorii. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/sovremennye-ekonomicheskie-paradigmy-i-razvitie-ekonomicheskoy-teorii/viewer. (in Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><mixed-citation>8.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Novejshy filosofsky slovar&amp;#39;. (2001). Sost. i gl. nauch. red. A.A. Gricanov. Minsk, Interpresservis, Kn. Dom, 1279 s. URL: http://www.philosophy.ru/edu/ref /slvrm.htm. (in Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><mixed-citation>9.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Popper K. (1983). Logika i rost nauchnogo znanya: izbr. raboty. Pod red. V.N. Sadovskogo. M., Progress, 605 p. (in Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><mixed-citation>10.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Romashhenko T.D. (2003). Ekonomicheskaya bezopasnost&amp;#39; natsional&amp;rsquo;nogo hozyaistva: teorya, metodologya, vosproizvodstvo: dis. &amp;hellip;d-ra ekon. nauk. Voronezh, 327 p. (in Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><mixed-citation>11.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Savel&amp;#39;ev M.Yu. (2015). Metodologicheskoe issledovanie paradigm ekonomicheskoi i upravlencheskoy nauki. Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta. T. 25, vyp. 6 (ch. 2) Ekonomika i pravo: 50&amp;ndash;57. (in Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><mixed-citation>12.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Feofilova T.Yu., Bol&amp;#39;shakov S.N. (2014). Teorya i metodologya ekonomicheskoi bezopasnosti v regional&amp;#39;nom kontekste: monografya. Syktyvkar, GOU VO KRAGSiU, 293 p. (in Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><mixed-citation>13.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Hodzhson Dzh. (2003). Ekonomicheskaya teorya i instituty: Manifest sovremennoy institucional&amp;#39;noy ekonomicheskoi teorii. Transl. from English&amp;ndash; M.: Delo, 464 p. (in Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><mixed-citation>14.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Chernikov T.S. (2013). Metodologicheskoe znachenie nauchnoy paradigmy dlya istorii razvitya ekonomicheskoi teorii. Ekonomicheskie nauki, 8(105). Ekonomicheskaya teorya: 49&amp;ndash;53. (in Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><mixed-citation>15.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Shabanova M.A. (2007). Socioekonomika i sotsial&amp;#39;no-ekonomicheskaya politika. Ekonomicheskaya nauka sovremennoy Rossii, 3 (38): 178. (in Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><mixed-citation>16.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Shurgalina I.N. (1997). Reformirovanie rossyskoy ekonomiki. Opyt analiza v svete teorii katastrof. M., ROSSPJeN, 221 p. (in Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><mixed-citation>17.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Ekonomicheskaya teorya na poroge XXI veka. (1998). Pod red. Yu.M. Osipova, V.T.&amp;nbsp;Pulyaeva, V.T. Ryazanova, E.S. Zotovoy. M., Yurist#, 768 p. (in Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><mixed-citation>18. Lakatos I. (1970). Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. URL: https://gtmarket.ru/library/basis/4369.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><mixed-citation>19. 2002). Darwinism in Economics: From Analogy to Ontology. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Vol. 12, Issue 3: 259&amp;ndash;281.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><mixed-citation>20. 2007). Heuristic Twists and Ontological Creeds &amp;ndash; A Road Map for Evolutionary Economics. Max Planck Institute of Economics. The Papers on Economics and Evolution.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><mixed-citation>Available at: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/31842/1/543493180.pdf.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><mixed-citation>&amp;nbsp;</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>