<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="ru" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2409-1634</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Research result. Economic Research</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2409-1634</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18413/2409-1634-2015-1-1-48-60</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">261</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>WOLD ECONOMY</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>BENCHMARKING OF INNOVATIVE DEVELOPMENT OF BRICS’ COUNTRIES AND IRAN BASED ON THE METHODOLOGY OF THE EUROPEAN INNOVATIVE BOARD AND THE GLOBAL COMPETITIVENESS INDEX</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>BENCHMARKING OF INNOVATIVE DEVELOPMENT OF BRICS’ COUNTRIES AND IRAN BASED ON THE METHODOLOGY OF THE EUROPEAN INNOVATIVE BOARD AND THE GLOBAL COMPETITIVENESS INDEX</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Moskovkin</surname><given-names>Vladimir M.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Moskovkin</surname><given-names>Vladimir M.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>moskovkin@bsu.edu.ru</email></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Saharova</surname><given-names>Olga S.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Saharova</surname><given-names>Olga S.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>sahar26@mail.ru</email></contrib></contrib-group><pub-date pub-type="epub"><year>2015</year></pub-date><volume>1</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>0</fpage><lpage>0</lpage><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="/media/economic/2015/1/6.pdf" /><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>The article deals with the methodology of the national innovative systems assessment with its traditional analytical techniques developed by the experts of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).Тhe possibility of using methodological tools of EIS (European Innovation Scoreboard) and GCI (Global Competitiveness Index) for a comparative analysis of countries innovative development and global competitiveness have been shown through the example of the BRICS countries and Iran. On the basis of GCI methodology, the series of Competitiveness scoreboard for the BRICS countries and Iran for the last three years have been built. On the basis of an equal five-level classification scale for the GCI indicators global competitiveness matrix based on 12 aggregated GCI indicators and matrix of strengths and weaknesses of competitiveness have been constructed. The analysis has enabled to classify the countries by their level of innovative development, and to emphasize substantial characteristics of the economies influencing their competitiveness.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The article deals with the methodology of the national innovative systems assessment with its traditional analytical techniques developed by the experts of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).Тhe possibility of using methodological tools of EIS (European Innovation Scoreboard) and GCI (Global Competitiveness Index) for a comparative analysis of countries innovative development and global competitiveness have been shown through the example of the BRICS countries and Iran. On the basis of GCI methodology, the series of Competitiveness scoreboard for the BRICS countries and Iran for the last three years have been built. On the basis of an equal five-level classification scale for the GCI indicators global competitiveness matrix based on 12 aggregated GCI indicators and matrix of strengths and weaknesses of competitiveness have been constructed. The analysis has enabled to classify the countries by their level of innovative development, and to emphasize substantial characteristics of the economies influencing their competitiveness.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>benchmarking</kwd><kwd>innovative development</kwd><kwd>European Innovation Scoreboard</kwd><kwd>Global Competitiveness Index</kwd><kwd>BRICS</kwd><kwd>Iran</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>benchmarking</kwd><kwd>innovative development</kwd><kwd>European Innovation Scoreboard</kwd><kwd>Global Competitiveness Index</kwd><kwd>BRICS</kwd><kwd>Iran</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>Список литературы</title><ref id="B1"><mixed-citation>Moskovkin V. M. The European Innovative Policy: Adaptation to CIS Countries Conditions // Problems of the Theory and Practice of Management. &amp;ndash; Vol. 2009, № 10. P. 24-33.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><mixed-citation>Moskovkin V. M. The Comparative Analysis of National Innovative Systems with Using of Global Competitiveness Index (on the Example of MEDA Countries) // Economy and Management. &amp;ndash; Vol. 2009, № 9. P. 30-35.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><mixed-citation>Moskovkin V. M. Development of Methodology for Assessing the Knowledge Economy: on the Example of ASEAN countries and MEDA // International Economics. &amp;ndash; Vol. 2011, № 4. P. 59-75.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><mixed-citation>Arundel A. European Innovation Scoreboard. Technical Paper №6. Methodology Report. November 14. 2003. - European Trend Chart on Innovation, European Commission Enterprise Directorate &amp;ndash; General, 2003. 29 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><mixed-citation>Chen D. H. C. The Knowledge Economy, the KAM Methodology and World Bank Operations. &amp;ndash; Washington, DC: The World Bank, 2005. 33 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><mixed-citation>Freeman C. Technology Policy and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan. &amp;ndash; London: Frances Pinter, 1987. 155 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><mixed-citation>Lundvall B.A. National Systems of Innovation. Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. &amp;ndash; London: Pinter Publishers, 1992. 22 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><mixed-citation>Hanouz M. D. Assessing Competitiveness of Nations: The Global Competitiveness Index // The Ukraine Competitiveness Report 2008. Towards Sustained Growth and Prosperity, World Economic Forum. &amp;ndash; Geneva, Switzerland 2008. P. 17-35.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><mixed-citation>National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis / Edited by R. R Nelson. &amp;ndash; N. Y.: Oxford University Press. 1993. 541 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><mixed-citation>The Global Competitiveness Report 2008- 2009, World Economic Forum. &amp;ndash; Geneva, Switzerland 2008. 500 p. 11.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><mixed-citation>The Global Competitiveness Report 2009- 2010, World Economic Forum. &amp;ndash; Geneva, Switzerland 2009. 479 p. 12.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><mixed-citation>The Global Competitiveness Report 2010- 2011, World Economic Forum. &amp;ndash; Geneva, Switzerland 2010. - 501 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><mixed-citation>The Global Competitiveness Index: Prioritizing the Economic Policy Agenda / Sala-i-Martin, X. Blanke, J., Hanous, M. D., Geiger, T., Мia, I., Paua, F. // The Global Competitiveness Report 2008&amp;ndash;2009, World Economic Forum. &amp;ndash; Geneva, Switzerland 2008. P. 3-42.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>