2409-1634Research result. Economic Research2409-163410.18413/2409-1634-2014-1-2-34-40267ECONOMICS,MANAGEMENT AND ACCOUNTING IN A FIRMDIALOGUE AND PROFESSIONALISM IN THE CONTEMPORARY ORGANIZATIONDIALOGUE AND PROFESSIONALISM IN THE CONTEMPORARY ORGANIZATIONStoyanovaSilviyaStoyanovaSilviyaDimitrina.kamenova@vumk.euKamenovaDimitrinaKamenovaDimitrinaDimitrina.kamenova@vumk.eu20141200

The dynamic changes as an integral part of everyday life are highly characteristic for the workplace. On the other hand, differences in cultural norms and values affect the changes specifically and add a different dimension to the processes that form the individual professionalism and the new reality in organizations expressed through collective intelligence. One of the resources for their formation is the dialogue. According to the varieties of dialogic interaction there are three types of dialogic subject and according to the prevailing type of individuals – three types of organizations. The purpose of the current paper is to set up a conceptual framework for professionalism based on the types of organizations according to the prevailing dialogic type of associates. Within the presented purpose the following tasks are placed: 1) presentation of the professionalism’s specifics as core drivers for effective development of the contemporary organization; 2) providing a proof of the dialogue’s importance as first-rate factor for formation of innovative type of professionalism; 3) presentation of the perceptions for professionalism in the context of the type of organizations according to the predominant dialogic type of professionals.

The dynamic changes as an integral part of everyday life are highly characteristic for the workplace. On the other hand, differences in cultural norms and values affect the changes specifically and add a different dimension to the processes that form the individual professionalism and the new reality in organizations expressed through collective intelligence. One of the resources for their formation is the dialogue. According to the varieties of dialogic interaction there are three types of dialogic subject and according to the prevailing type of individuals – three types of organizations. The purpose of the current paper is to set up a conceptual framework for professionalism based on the types of organizations according to the prevailing dialogic type of associates. Within the presented purpose the following tasks are placed: 1) presentation of the professionalism’s specifics as core drivers for effective development of the contemporary organization; 2) providing a proof of the dialogue’s importance as first-rate factor for formation of innovative type of professionalism; 3) presentation of the perceptions for professionalism in the context of the type of organizations according to the predominant dialogic type of professionals.

professionalismdialogueclassicself-regulating and self-developing type of organizationprofessionalismdialogueclassicself-regulating and self-developing type of organizationСписок литературыKamenova, D. Dialogics of Management [Text]: monograph / D. Kamenova. Publishing House of International University College, 2014. – 320 p.Stepin, V. S. Self-developing Systems and Post-non-Classical Rationality // Voprosi Filosifii. 2003. № 8. С. 16-17.Allen, K. E. The purpose of scholarship: Redefining meaning for student affairs // NASPA Journal. 2002. 39.2.  P. 147–157.Brint, S. Eliot Friedson’s contribution to the sociology of professions // Work & Occupations. 1993. 20(3). P. 259–279.Carpenter S., Stimpson M. Professionalism, Scholarly Practice and Professional Development in Student Affairs // NASPA Journal. 2007.  Vol. 44. №. 2. P.265-284Fried, J. The scholarship of student affairs: Integration and application  // NASPA Journal. 2002.  39(2). P. 120–131.Friedson, E. Professional Powers. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 1986. 260 p.Malaney G. D. Scholarship in student affairs through teaching and research // NASPA Journal. 2002.  39. P. 132–146.National Professionalism Survey. Workplace Report. Center for Professional Excellence: York College. 2013. 74 p.Saunders, S., Register, M., Cooper, D., Bates, J., & Dadonna, M. Who is writing research articles in student affairs journals/practitioner involvement and collaboration? // Journal of College Student Development. 2000. (41). P. 609–615.Schroeder, C. C., & Pike, G. R. The scholarship of application in student affairs // Journal of College Student Development. 2001. 42. P. 342–355.Twinn,C. Professionalism, sustainability and the public interest:what next? // Building Research & Information. 2013. 41(1). P. 123–128.Veysey, L. R. Marxism and class theory: A bourgeois critique. New York: Columbia University Press. 1988. 14.  Wilensky, H. L. The professionalization of everyone? // American Journal of Sociology. 1964. 70. P. 137–158.