2409-1634Research result. Economic Research2409-163410.18413/2409-1634-2015-1-2-62-69292branch and regional economyJUSTIFICATION OF THE EVALUATION SYSTEM OF THE MUNICIPAL MANAGEMENT’S PERFORMANCEJUSTIFICATION OF THE EVALUATION SYSTEM OF THE MUNICIPAL MANAGEMENT’S PERFORMANCEAnokhovAlexey V.AnokhovAlexey V.senator78@mail.ruGorbovaOlga Y.GorbovaOlga Y.odina-olga@yandex.ru20151200

The article is an attempt to form a system of evaluation of the effectiveness of the municipal management. Nowadays, this system is a set of indicators in the absence of a mechanism to construct the general assessment. The authors have proposed the mechanism for constructing a system of indicators of municipal management performance on the basis of the hierarchy. The top level of the hierarchy is common indicators reflecting the final result of the region’s work. The lower levels of the hierarchy describe the immediate results of the individual executive bodies of the power and their divisions. The construction of such a hierarchy allows setting the centers of responsibility for the individual spheres of the municipal government even for the ordinary specialists of the municipal authorities. An example of constructing a system of indicators for the economic sphere of development of the municipal education is given. This example has been built on the basis of the data of the city of Ryazan, and illustrates the principle of hierarchy of the performance indicators of the municipal management in the city.

The article is an attempt to form a system of evaluation of the effectiveness of the municipal management. Nowadays, this system is a set of indicators in the absence of a mechanism to construct the general assessment. The authors have proposed the mechanism for constructing a system of indicators of municipal management performance on the basis of the hierarchy. The top level of the hierarchy is common indicators reflecting the final result of the region’s work. The lower levels of the hierarchy describe the immediate results of the individual executive bodies of the power and their divisions. The construction of such a hierarchy allows setting the centers of responsibility for the individual spheres of the municipal government even for the ordinary specialists of the municipal authorities. An example of constructing a system of indicators for the economic sphere of development of the municipal education is given. This example has been built on the basis of the data of the city of Ryazan, and illustrates the principle of hierarchy of the performance indicators of the municipal management in the city.

outcome indicatorsindicators of direct resultevaluation of the municipal management performanceoutcome indicatorsindicators of direct resultevaluation of the municipal management performanceСписок литературыGroot T., Budding T. New Public Management's Current Issues and Future Prospects // Financial Accountability & Management. 24(1). February 2008. P. 1-13.Kapucu N. New Public Management: Theory, Ideology, and Practice Handbook of Globalization. URL: http://www.academia. edu/4183261/New_Public_Management_ Theory_Ideology_and_Practice (date of access: February 14, 2015).Youker R. Defining the Hierarchy of Project Objectives. URL: http://www.maxwideman. com/guests/hierarchy/objectives.htm (date of access: February 10, 2015).Robertson T. An Example of a Project Hierarchy. URL: http://smallbusiness.chron. com/example-project-hierarchy-34604.html (date of access: February 10, 2015).Rockwell К., Bennett С. A Hierarchy for Targeting Outcomes and Evaluating Their Achievement. URL: http://www.uaf.edu/ files/ces/reporting/logicmodel/TOP.pdf (date of access: February 10, 2015).Perfiliev S.V., Loginov. I.N., Gorbova O.Y. Dudukina O.I. Programme-Oriented Management of Regional Development. Ryazan, 2013. 128 p.On the General Principles of Local Government in the Russian Federation: Federal Law of 06.10.2003 № 131-FZ.On the Assessment of the Effectiveness of the LSG Urban Districts and Municipal Areas: Presidential Decree of 28.04.2008 № 607.On measures to Implement the Presidential Decree of April 28, 2008 № 607 "On the Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Local Government of Urban and Municipal Districts" and Subparagraph "i" of Paragraph 2 of the Presidential Decree of May 7, 2012 № 601 "On the Main Directions of improving the System of Public Administration": Resolution of the Government of the Russian Federation of December 17, 2012 № 1317.On approval of the Strategic Development Plan of the City of Ryazan to 2020: Ryazan City Council Decision of March 26, 2009 № 169-I.