2409-1634Research result. Economic Research2409-163410.18413/2409-1634-2023-9-1-0-43049branch and regional economy<strong>INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT FOR REGIONAL INNOVATIVE DEVELOPMENT</strong> <div>&nbsp;</div><strong>INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT FOR REGIONAL INNOVATIVE DEVELOPMENT</strong> <div>&nbsp;</div>RozeNelly ShRozeNelly Shnellliona@yandex.ruKuzminykhNatalia A.KuzminykhNatalia A.kashatan@inbox.ru20239100

&nbsp;The article is devoted to the issue of intellectual capital management in the interests of innovative development of the region. The purpose of the work is to develop methodological recommendations for the management of intellectual capital in the interests of innovative development. To do this, the authors propose an approach to defining an intellectual capital management strategy based on an approach to assessing intellectual capital and its components, scenarios and a strategy selection matrix. Methods of comparative and system analysis, linear scaling, prioritization, scenario planning was used as research methods. Visualization of the calculation results was performed using the GeoDa spatial modeling software package. The proposed developments were tested on data from 72 regions of Russia, for which recommendations were developed to determine the scenario of formation and use and the choice of an intellectual capital management strategy in the interests of innovative development. The proposed approach differs in the method of assessing intellectual capital, which implies an assessment not only of the level of IC, but also of the degree of balance of its structural components, which, in the form of two main criteria, forms the basis of the matrix for choosing an intellectual capital management strategy and allows taking into account the peculiarities of the interaction of human, structural and relational capitals of each subject under consideration. According to the results of the study, the scenario of the formation and use of intellectual capital for most Russian regions is defined as based on a system-forming component in the form of human capital. It is revealed that most of the regions are characterized by an average level of intellectual capital and a low balance of structural components, which determines the feasibility of developing recommendations for intellectual capital management based on an active support strategy. The results obtained can be useful for representatives of regional authorities, line ministries and departments to determine strategies for managing intellectual capital in the interests of innovative development. Further development of research can be aimed at building a system of quantitative assessment of the impact of intellectual capital and its balanced structural components in the results of innovative development of regions.

&nbsp;The article is devoted to the issue of intellectual capital management in the interests of innovative development of the region. The purpose of the work is to develop methodological recommendations for the management of intellectual capital in the interests of innovative development. To do this, the authors propose an approach to defining an intellectual capital management strategy based on an approach to assessing intellectual capital and its components, scenarios and a strategy selection matrix. Methods of comparative and system analysis, linear scaling, prioritization, scenario planning was used as research methods. Visualization of the calculation results was performed using the GeoDa spatial modeling software package. The proposed developments were tested on data from 72 regions of Russia, for which recommendations were developed to determine the scenario of formation and use and the choice of an intellectual capital management strategy in the interests of innovative development. The proposed approach differs in the method of assessing intellectual capital, which implies an assessment not only of the level of IC, but also of the degree of balance of its structural components, which, in the form of two main criteria, forms the basis of the matrix for choosing an intellectual capital management strategy and allows taking into account the peculiarities of the interaction of human, structural and relational capitals of each subject under consideration. According to the results of the study, the scenario of the formation and use of intellectual capital for most Russian regions is defined as based on a system-forming component in the form of human capital. It is revealed that most of the regions are characterized by an average level of intellectual capital and a low balance of structural components, which determines the feasibility of developing recommendations for intellectual capital management based on an active support strategy. The results obtained can be useful for representatives of regional authorities, line ministries and departments to determine strategies for managing intellectual capital in the interests of innovative development. Further development of research can be aimed at building a system of quantitative assessment of the impact of intellectual capital and its balanced structural components in the results of innovative development of regions.

intellectual capitalinnovative developmentassessment of the level of intellectual capitalhuman capitalstructural capitalrelational capitalintellectual capital management strategyintellectual capitalinnovative developmentassessment of the level of intellectual capitalhuman capitalstructural capitalrelational capitalintellectual capital management strategyСписок литературыGrudina, S.I. (2020). Rent approach to the interpretation of the intangible capital of the region. Vestnik ekonomiki, prava i sotsiologii [Bulletin of Economics, Law and Sociology], (3),24-26. (In Russ).Makarov, P. Yu. (2015). Management of intellectual capital in the region. Monograph. Moscow: RIOR : INFRA-M, 152. (In Russ).Ostashchenko, T.V., Dubina I.N. (2020). Assessment of intellectual capital and its connection with the level of economic development of the Altai Territory and the Siberian Federal District. Ekonomika. Professiya. Biznes [Economics. Profession. Business], (4), 98-107. DOI: 10.14258/epb2019106. (In Russ).Angehrn, A. A. (2011). Learning-by-playing: bridging the knowing-doing gap in urban communities. Intellectual Capital for Communities. Nations, regions and cities, USA, 299&ndash;316. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-7506-7773-8.50021-2.Bontis N (2004) National intellectual capital index: a United Nations initiative for the Arab region. Journal of Intellectual capital, 5 (1): 13-39.Chursin A. A., Yudin A.V., Grosheva P. Yu. (2021). Intellectual capital of technological transformation of the economy of an industrial region. Journal of Applied Economic Research. 2021. Vol. 20, No. 4. pp. 641-665. DOI: 10.15826/vestnik.2021.20.4.025. (Accessed: 20.11.22) (In Russ).Corpakis, D. A. (2011). European regional path to the knowledge economy: challenges and opportunities. Intellectual Capital for Communities. Nations, regions and cities, USA, 213&ndash;226. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-7506-7773-8.50016-9.Dyr, T., Zi&oacute;łkowska, K. (2017). The intellectual capital as the regions&rsquo; competitiveness factor. Central European Review of Economics &amp; Finance, 17(1), 33-51. https://doi.org/10.24136/ceref.2017.002. (Accessed: 20.11.22)Liu, C., Li, K., Jiang, P., Li, D., Su, L., Lu, S., &amp; Li, A. (2021). A Hybrid Multiple Criteria Decision-Making Technique to Evaluate Regional Intellectual Capital: Evidence from China. Mathematics. 2021, 9, 1 676. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/math9141676. (Accessed 20 November 2022)Liu, C., Li, X., &amp; Xu, L. (2014). The Influence of Regional Intellectual Capital on Regional Economic Development: Evidence from Shandong Province. // 2014 International Conference on Management of e-Commerce and e-Government, 2014. Pp. 280-284. DOI:10.1109/icmecg.2014.64.Markhaichuk, M., &amp; Zhuckovskaya, I. (2019). The spread of the regional intellectual capital: the case of the Russian Federation. Oeconomia Copernicana, 10(1), 89-111. DOI: 10.24136/oc.2019.005.Nevado Pe&ntilde;a, D., Alfaro Navarro, J.L. i L&oacute;pez Ruiz, V.R. (2017). Castilla-La Mancha Cities&#39; Competitiveness in Intellectual Capital as Compared to Other Spanish Cities. Dru&scaron;tvena istraživanja, 26 (4), 519-538. https://doi.org/10.5559/di.26.4.04. (Accessed 20 November 2022)North, K., Kares, S. (2011). Ragusa or how to measure ignorance: the ignorance meter. Intellectual Capital for Communities. Nations, regions and cities, USA, 253&ndash;252. DOI: 10.1016/В978-0-7506-7773-8.50018-2.Pachura, P., Nitkiewicz, T., Matlovičov&aacute;, K., &amp; Matlovič, R. (2018). Identification of Intellectual Capital Performance Using Data Envelopment Analysis. Advances in Spatial Science, 115&ndash;130. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-67029-4_4.Paszko, J. (2020). Intellectual capital of European Union countries (EU-28) &ndash; measurement concept. Optimum Economic Studies, 3 (101): 107-122. DOI: 10.15290/oes.2020.03.101.09.Pomeda, J. Moreno, C., Rivera, C., Villar, L. (2002). Towards an intellectual capital report of Madrid: new insights and developments. Paper presented at The Transparent Enterprise. The Value of Intangibles (Madrid, 25&ndash;26 November), p. 20.Pulic, A. (2000). VAIC&trade; &ndash; an accounting tool for IC management. International Journal of Technology Management, 20(5/6/7/8), 702&ndash;714. DOI: 10.1504/IJTM.2000.002891.Qun, Zeng, ZhenHai, Tan, Chunnian, Liu (2021). Analysis of the Contribution of Intellectual Capital to Economic Growth Based on an Empirical Analysis of Prefecture-Level Cities in Guangxi, Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2021. vol. 2021, 12 p. doi: 10.1155/2021/9962010.Roze, N.Sh. (2021) Measurement of the intellectual capital of Russian regions. R-economy, 7(2), 72&ndash;87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15826/recon.2021.7.2.007.St&aring;hle, P., P&ouml;yh&ouml;nen, A. (2005). Intellectual capital and national competitiveness: a critical examination. Case Finland Paper presented at the 6th European Conference of Knowledge Management (ECKM), University of Limerick (Limerick), pp. 575-583.Stam, C, Andriessen, D. (2009). Intellectual Capital of the European Union 2008: Measuring the Lisbon Strategy for Growth and Jobs. Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, Volume 7 Issue 4, pp. 489-500.Stan, S.E. (2018). Analysis of the Impact of Intangible Resources at Macroeconomic Level. The Case of Romania. International conference Knowledge-based organization, 24, 104 &ndash; 98. DOI:10.1515/kbo-2018-0072Veselinović P. &amp; Veljković M. (2021). Intellectual Capital in Terms of Regional Development of the Republic of Serbia, Economic Themes, Sciendo, vol. 59(3), pages 315-340, September. DOI: 10.2478/ethemes-2021-0018.Viedma, Marti Jose Maria. (2011). Cities&rsquo; Intellectual Capital Benchmarking System (CICBS): A Methodology and a Framework for Measuring and Managing Intellectual Capital of Cities: A Practical Application in the City of Mataro. Intellectual capital for communities. Nations, Regions and Cities, USA: Elsevier Buttenworth-Heinemann, 317&ndash;336. DOI:10.1016/B978-0-7506-7773-8.50022-4.Weziak, D. (2007). Measurement of national intellectual capital: application to EU countries. IRISS Working Paper Series. INSEAD, (Lifferdange November), p. 45.Mamatov A.V., Mashkova A.L., Savina O.A. Forecasting the dynamics of personnel potential in the regions of Russia using the methods of agent-based modeling // Artificial Societies. 2019. V. 14. No. 3. p. 7-7.Vaganova O.V. Finansovye mekhanizmy obespechenija intensifikatsii innovatsionnogo proizvodstva. Korporativnye finansy. 2010. № 3.Pp. 78 &ndash; 89.Titov A.B., Vaganova O.V. Nekotorye aspekty formirovanija regionalnoy innovatsionnoj sistemy na primere Belgorodskoy oblasti. Izvestya Irkutskoy gosudarstvennoy ekonomicheskoy akademii. 2016. № 4. Pp. 550 &ndash; 556.