2409-1634Research result. Economic Research2409-163410.18413/2409-1634-2026-12-3-0-34338WOLD ECONOMYEURASIAN UTILITY MODEL AS AN ELEMENT OF ECONOMIC SECURITYEURASIAN UTILITY MODEL AS AN ELEMENT OF ECONOMIC SECURITYTysherVladimir V.TysherVladimir V.v.tysher@rgiis.ru202612300

The article explores the role of the Eurasian utility model as an element of the economic security system of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU). It examines the features of legal protection of utility models in the EAEU member states and analyzes the differences in national mechanisms for registering and protecting industrial property rights. Based on a comparative legal, institutional, and systemic approach, the article identifies existing problems in harmonizing legislation on the protection of utility models, which have an impact on the innovative development and technological security of the EAEU member states. Special attention is paid to threats to economic security related to industrial espionage, unfair competition, illegal use of the results of intellectual activity, and the impact of sanctions on national economies. An analysis of foreign experience in protecting intellectual property and international practices for regulating innovation is conducted.

The article explores the role of the Eurasian utility model as an element of the economic security system of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU). It examines the features of legal protection of utility models in the EAEU member states and analyzes the differences in national mechanisms for registering and protecting industrial property rights. Based on a comparative legal, institutional, and systemic approach, the article identifies existing problems in harmonizing legislation on the protection of utility models, which have an impact on the innovative development and technological security of the EAEU member states. Special attention is paid to threats to economic security related to industrial espionage, unfair competition, illegal use of the results of intellectual activity, and the impact of sanctions on national economies. An analysis of foreign experience in protecting intellectual property and international practices for regulating innovation is conducted.

Eurasian utility modelintellectual propertypatent laweconomic securityEAEUinnovative activitiesand technological sovereigntyEurasian utility modelintellectual propertypatent laweconomic securityEAEUinnovative activitiesand technological sovereigntyСписок литературыArakelova, A.O. and Zolotov, G.B. (2023), ‘Creating a Eurasian digital IP system’, IP: Teoriya i Praktika [IP: Theory and Practice], 3, pp. 42–55.Guseinova, L.N. (2024), ‘International and public legal aspects of ensuring digitalisation in the EAEU’, Ekonomika i Pravo [Economics and Law], 9, pp. 143–147.Dzhalilov, E.A. (2020), ‘Signs of an infringement in the field of intellectual property’, Voprosy Rossiyskogo i Mezhdunarodnogo Prava [Issues of Russian and International Law], 1, pp. 284–289.Konoplyanik, A.A. (2025), ‘The pyramid of energytechnological cooperation of BRICS for energy consolidation of Eurasia’, Evraziyskie Issledovaniya [Eurasian Studies], 2, pp. 5–30.Lozina, Yu.A. and Litvinenko, A.N. (2024), ‘Intellectual property protection as a key element of knowledge economy development’, π Economy, 3, pp. 18–32.Novak, A. and Perchinskaya, N.P. (2013), ‘Intellectual property as an important factor of innovative development of the Republic of Moldova’, Innovatsii v Stranakh SNG [Innovations in CIS Countries], 4, pp. 106–110.Omarova, Z.K., Kareeva, E.D. and Shidieva, A.S. (2025), ‘Digitalisation as a tool for enhancing the competitiveness of the national economy’, Vestnik Tverskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika i Upravlenie [Bulletin of Tver State University. Series: Economics and Management], 4, pp. 231–241.Savina, N.P. and Parfenova, V.I. (2023), ‘Prospects for scientificinnovative and educational integration of EAEU member states’, Ekonomika i Upravlenie Innovatsiyami [Economics and Innovation Management], 4, pp. 28–38.Yanchuk, A.L. (2021), ‘Comparative analysis of the development of the intellectual property sphere in Belarus and other EAEU countries’, Vestnik Polotskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. Seriya D [Bulletin of Polotsk State University. Series D], 14, pp. 85–90.On the state of legal protection of intellectual property in Kazakhstan (2026) [Online], available at: https://prg.kz/document/?doc_id=38287598&pos=4;156 (Accessed 18 February 2026).Drug smuggling in Kyrgyzstan: scale and detection methods (2022) [Online]. Sputnik Kyrgyzstan, available at: https://ru.sputnik.kg/20220708/kyrgyzstan-lekarstva-kontrabanda-1065927973.html (Accessed 18 February 2026).Maskus K.E. Intellectual Property Rights in the Global Economy. Washington: Peterson Institute for International Economics, 2000.Hall B.H., Harhoff D. Recent Research on the Economics of Patents. Annual Review of Economics. 2012. Vol. 4. P. 541–565.World Intellectual Property Indicators 2024. Geneva: WIPO, 2024.WIPO Intellectual Property Handbook. Geneva: World Intellectual Property Organization, 2022.OECD Science, Technology and Innovation Outlook 2023. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2023.Ginarte, J.C., Park, W.G. (1997) “Determinants of Patent Rights: A Cross-National Study”, Research Policy, Vol. 26, No. 3, P. 283–301.Park, W.G. (2023) “International Patent Protection: 1960–2020, Research Policy, Vol. 52, No. 1.World Intellectual Property Report 2024. Geneva: WIPO, 2024.