ANALYSIS OF THE STRUCTURE OF THE ARMENIAN ECONOMY: KEY DEVELOPMENT TRENDS
The key objective of macroeconomic regulation is to achieve economic growth in the short and medium term and economic development in terms of a long-term strategy.At the same time, it seems important both to consider the dynamics of indicators for the economy as a whole and to analyze the specifics of individual sectors of the economy. As many studies of the structure of the economy show, the priority development of certain industries is strategically important from the point of view of ensuring sustainable rates of economic growth in the long term. In this regard, within the framework of this study, the Armenian economy was analyzed, both in terms of key development and growth trends in general, and an analysis of all existing sectors in the economy was carried out. The structure of GDP in terms of key types of economic activity was taken as a basis.
While nobody left any comments to this publication.
You can be first.
1. Acemoglu, D., S. Johnson, and J.A. Robinson. (2001). “The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation.”
American Economic Review 91:1369– 401.
2. Chenery H.B., (1960), “Patterns of Industrial Growth”, American Economic Review, 50(4): 624-654.
3. Chenery H.B., and Taylor L., (1968), “Development Patterns: Among Countries and Over Time”, Review of Economics and Statistics,
50(4): 391-416.
4. Clark C., (1940), The Conditions of Economic Progress, Macmillan, London 5. Fisher A.G.B., (1939), “Production:
Primary, Secondary and Tertiary”, Economic Record, 15:24-38.
6. GlaeserE., and A. Shleifer. (2002). “Legal Origins.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 117 (November): 1193–229.
7. Harrison A., and A. Rodrı´guez-Clare. (2010). “Trade, Foreign Investment, and Industrial Policy for Developing Countries.” In D. Rodrik
(ed.), Handbook of Economic Growth, Vol. 5. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North-Holland, p. 4039–213.
8. Jackson R.W., (1989), “Probabilistic InputOutput Analysis: Modeling Directions”, SocioEconomic Planning Sciences, 23(1-2): 87-95.
9. Jackson R.W., Rogerson P., Plane D., and Huallachain O. B.., (1990), “A Causative Matrix Approach to Interpreting Structural Change”,
Economic Systems Research, 2(3):259-269.
10. Jones C.I., and P.M. Romer. (2009). “The New Kaldor Facts: Ideas, Institutions, Population, and Human Capital.” NBER Working Paper Series 15094.
11. Kenessey Z., (1987), “The Primary, Secondary, Tertiary and Quaternary Sectors of the Economy”, Review of Income and Wealth,
33(4):359-385.
12. Malecki E.J., (1991), Technology and Economic Development: The Dynamics of Local, Regional and National Change, Longman,
London. 13. Prasad E., (1997), “Sector Shifts and Structural Change in the Japanese Economy: Evidence and Interpretation”, Japan and the World Economy, 9:293- 213.
14. Syrquin M., and Chenery, H.B., (1989), Patterns of Development, 1950 to 1983, World Bank Discussion Papers, No. 41, World Bank,
Washington D.C.
15. System of National Accounts 2008. Copyright © 2012 The European Commission the International Monetary Fund the Organization for
Economic Cooperation and Development The United Nations and the World Bank.
16. Statistical Committee of the Republic of Armenia [Electronic resource] Access mode: https://www.armstat.am/ru (Accessed 12 January
2023).
17. West G.R., and Brown R.P., (2003), “Structural Change, Inter Sectoral Linkages and Hollowing Out in the Taiwanese Economy, 1976-
1994”, Unpublished Paper, School of Economics, The University of Queensland, 1-41.