Introduction
Today is a very difficult time, when the world economy is being transformed, its structure and key players on the world stage are changing. The economic development of many countries is subject to severe fluctuations that could lead the country to fundamentally new positions in the global economic space. It should be noted that these positions can have both positive and negative dynamics.
Undoubtedly, this process is influenced by the aggravation of contradictions between different states. Those who had a leading position
may gradually fade into the background, thus the states at all costs want to maintain their primacy, using various methods and instruments, including military ones.
One of the most popular methods of influence is the sanctions pressure, which is expressed in the ban on the movement of capital, its access to world markets, in limiting exportimport operations, especially for strategically important and high-tech goods. Economic weakening of the state and the imposition of its political will by the dominants is supposed to be the result of the sanctions pressure.
In 2022, Russia faced another sanctions pressure when it recognized the independence of the Luhansk People’s Republic and the
Donetsk People’s Republic. Since then, Russia became the leader in terms of the number of sanctions imposed against it.

Main part
History of sanctions pressure on Russia
When examining global pressure and its consequences on Russia, it is necessary to start with the fact that sanctions pressure is not new for the Russian economy and has a century of history [Vaganova, 2019].

In 1917, when the new Soviet state was formed, the countries of Western Europe and America tried to hinder the development of Russia and imposed a commercial and naval blockade. Such behavior of the Entente countries had been dictated by the desire to get payments on debts of the Russian Empire and to return the capital invested in the enterprises that were nationalized. The blockade was unsuccessful on the part of the Entente and was ended in 1920. Some foreign sources claim this blockade had affected the decline in foreign trade, which fell almost to zero. However, if we consider that the entire national economic complex of Soviet Union in those years
was destroyed and the state had to build a New Economic Policy (NEP), then we can say that the embargo measures had been untenable. Since 1925, foreign countries have made a number of attempts to inflict an economic blow on the USSR. They demanded payment for the supplied equipment and new technologies not in monetary units, but in natural products, including wood, grain, oil, gold. Such calculations were made until 1934. In the same years, a financial blockade was introduced, which was crediting the Soviet economy on deliberately unfavorable terms. After World War II, the situation began to improve, because the Soviet state had had allies that entered the so-called contour of the socialist camp. Ever since, the relations of the USSR began to develop rapidly, the country actively used foreign technology and equipment, and created thousands of new plants and factories. Such economic growth could not fail to interest unfriendly countries, and in 1949 the USA, the United Kingdom, Canada, France, Germany, Australia, Japan, etc., had formed the Coordinating Committee for Multilateral Export Controls (CoCom), which for decades compiled lists of strategic goods and technologies that are not subject to export to the countries of the Socialist Camp. The impact of sanctions on the economy of the USSR had not become disastrous. USSR government authorities made many efforts to restore and normalize economic relations with the West. In 1952, an International Economic Conference was held in Moscow.
It was attended by business representatives, trade unionists, scientists and journalists from several dozen countries. The main issue
of the event was an attempt to jointly search for opportunities to develop peaceful cooperation between various political systems
through the development of economic ties. In 2014, after the Crimea joined Russia, restrictions were imposed by the EU and American countries on the supply of dual-use goods to the Russian Federation for enterprises of the military-industrial complex and on the transfer of equipment for the development of deep-sea, Arctic and shale oil fields. Nevertheless, Russia is among the leaders in oil and gas sales. In the same year, a food embargo was introduced on Russia, i.e. a ban on the import of certain agricultural products, raw materials and food from the countries of the European Union, the United States, Australia, Canada, Norway, etc. For Russia, the embargo contributed to the growth of agricultural production and the food industry. The production of meat, dairy  products, and vegetables increased 3, 2.8, and 3.5 times, respectively. All these achievements have reduced import dependence in the agro-food sector and increased the country’s food security. Some countries that imposed sanctions against Russia also benefited from the embargo. For example, the Faroe Islands of Denmark have increased the supply of fish  products to Russia. Russia still has a friendly attitude towards economic relations with all countries, and only some are still trying to dictate their terms to it, not realizing that the sanctions imposed against Russia may create the opposite effect.
Current state of the Russian economy

For some reason, Western countries consider Russia’s economy to be weak, thus they have probably started to impose various types of sanctions, believing that they should cause enormous damage to the already not very developed economy. But, according to a number of scientists, including foreign ones,

the Russian economy is in a relatively healthy and stable state. It is possible to prove the success of the development of the Russian economy by analyzing the main indicators characterizing the economic situation in the country over the past eight years, starting in 2014, when sanctions were imposed because of Crimea joining the Russian Federation (Table 2).

Examining the data in the table, we observe that the Russian economy has been operating at full capacity over the past eight years. Its economic growth averages 4.1%. Slight fluctuations were seen in 2020 due to the introduction of some restrictions related to COVID-19, but already in 2021, GDP growth rates are gaining strength again. This positive trend can be explained by rapid credit growth, investment activity on the demand side, high household consumption, return to the fullfledged retail market, and the functioning of the transport network. The construction industry  has had a positive impact on the growth rate of the Russian economy, which has become more active due to the implementation of state concessional lending programs and the application of direct state support measures. All sectors of the economy have shown positive dynamics, surpassing the prepandemic indicators.
It is possible to change the role of Russia in global markets and to acquire a new quality of development. To do this, it is necessary
to increase the share of investment in GDP to 25% by 2025, which can be obtained from both own funds of enterprises and funds
from the federal and regional budgets. In the face of uncertainty, external pressure and tightening restrictions in international financial
markets, the role of foreign business investment is minimized, because it can be withdrawn from the economy at any moment,
while public investment comes to the fore.
Therefore, the Development Fund created by the state, which in 2018 was equal to 3.5 tril lion rubles, effectively influences economic
processes in the country and contributes to the development of Russian entrepreneurship.
In terms of world economic trends, the economy is growing at a rate of 3.3%, according to the Organization for Economic Cooperation
and Development (OECD) [World economy, 2017]. It is obvious that the structural elements of the world economy are developing at different rates. The average growth of advanced economies is 6.1%, while developing economies have a lower growth rate of 3.1%, and transition economies are even lower at 2.2%. Consequently, Russia, with an economic growth rate of 4.1%, is a worthy partner in the world market. Sanctions pressure on Russia Today, Russia is facing perhaps the heaviest sanctions in modern Russian history,
both in terms of the scale of economic restrictions and in terms of the number of countries that have joined the sanctions pressure.
World economic leaders have long used constraining instruments for the development of other countries, exposing them to the risks
related to increased protectionism, financial vulnerability, potential energy price volatility, and imposing economic sanctions. Conventionally, economic sanctions can be divided into two main blocks. The first one is a ban on capital movements, i.e. limiting
the access of domestic credit institutions to the European capital market. The second is a restriction of export-import transactions, limiting
trade and production interaction with a number of sectors of the Russian economy, which include aviation, military-industrial,
and fuel and energy complexes. In 2014, according to a number of Russian scientists, the losses of the Russian economy
from the sanctions regime amounted to 258 billion US dollars per year. It is too early to calculate a loss from today’s sanctions, but
we can assume that they will not have a devastating impact on the Russian economy, as in previous periods. Russia can acquire positive
aspects for its development, and, as the President of the Russian Federation noted, get additional competencies.
Financial block of sanctions. This block includes sanctions against public debt, freezing the assets of major companies and banks.
However, such restrictions will not place a heavy burden on the Russian economy, because it has its own resources. There are accumulated funds in the amount of almost 40 trillion rubles due to the successful functioning of the domestic industry, as well as the
savings of Russian citizens. Moreover, Russia took advantage of the economic and political situation and earned about 20 billion US dollars on the stock exchange in a few days at the beginning of March 2022. The Government of the Russian Federation allocated funds from the Russian National Welfare Fund (NWF) and bought out about 30% of the shares of Russian monopolies. This was facilitated by
the collapse of Russia’s energy companies, caused by the uncertain political situation in Russia and Ukraine. Max Otte, a well-known
economist, financial expert and writer, in an interview with DWN notes that the tense military-political situation between Russia and
Ukraine is turning the stock market upside down, now there are many transactions on the market [Otte, M. Der Krieg wirbelt…, 2022].
Shareholders tried to sell their shares at any price, as long as they did not depreciate completely.
As a result, a part of the shares of energy companies now is owned by Russian investors, not foreign (American or European)
ones. Consequently, the bulk of the oil and gas revenues will fall into the Russian treasury, and not leak out of the country or settle
off-shore as before. Replenishment of the budget will have a positive impact on the financing of social sectors such as education,
medicine, culture, sports, social security. As for the disconnection from the SWIFT international interbank payment system,
it should be noted that the Russian financial infrastructure will work uninterruptedly through the domestic alternative System for
Transfer of Financial Messages (SPFS) which started to operate in December 2020. Besides that, such types of money transfers as electronic wallets of Russian operators (QIWI, UMoney) continue their functioning. Thus, the disconnection from SWIFT will not affect
or have a minimal impact on domestic transfers of individuals. But how foreign partners will pay for oil, gas and fertilizers bought in
our country, is a big question.
The second sanctions block includes restrictions on export-import operations. Sanctioners plan to significantly restrict access to technical solutions necessary not only for the development of the defense industry, but also for strategically important industries such as
petrochemical production, automobile and aircraft industries, railway and space industries, information and communication technology
(ICT). But are these measures really that effective? Many important companies in the global market are suspending their activities, rather
than refusing to cooperate and operate in Russia completely. For example, the EU has banned the operation of its aircraft and closed
the skies for Russia. In response to this atepe, the Russian side banned flights over its country. In this situation, European and British airlines incur a loss of almost 0.5 million US dollars daily [Closed Skies: …, 2022], flying to Asia not through the Trans-Siberian route,
but through the southern corridor, making a huge detour. But the American Boeing did not impose such sanctions and will continue to
operate, taking market share and profit from Europeans. This type of sanction will have a positive impact for the Russian economy, as well
as for Boeing. The aviation and aircraft manufacturing industries will receive an unprecedented impetus for their development. Instead
of purchasing or leasing foreign aircraft, domestic manufacturers will be supported to expand the production of civil aircraft and aircraft
engines. The number of domestic flights will be increased. If we consider the automotive industry, then by banning the import of European cars into Russia, the EU countries are losing a huge Russian market and ruining their industry, giving a great opportunity to develop the
Russian automotive industry. While exploring the situation on the commodity market, Russia is again in a better position than the Western countries. It is the largest supplier of energy, titanium and palladium to the world market. Therefore, obviously, it can dictate own terms of delivery. At the beginning of March 2022 there has been a rise in gas prices in Europe from 900 to 3,800, an increase in oil prices, which amount to more than 100 US dollars per barrel. Describing the financial block of sanctions, it has been mentioned that the main part of the revenue from the oil and gas industry will go to the treasury of Russia, and not settle offshore. Therefore, Russian citizens will benefit from
the sanctions, although they will suffer some inconvenience, for example, in the information and communication space. But here there is the second side of the coin, after having banned the broadcasting of Russian channels on the territory of Europe, a ban on the use of foreign information channels in Russia was introduced. This ban is not palpable for the Russians but is painful for the sanctioners.
They themselves beat out the trump card and create the prerequisites for stagnation of their economies.
Conclusion
Sanctions pressure is more of a psychological nature than an economic one. It is not profitable to withdraw business from Russia for the majority of large foreign companies. Foreign economic ties are easy to break and take years to recover. Neither business nor the Russian authorities have the goal of weakening their economic position in the global space, so common sense must prevail. Making predictions in a tense military-political situation is difficult and not grateful, but in reality, Europe will soon abandon a number of sanctions, because otherwise the European economy will face, if not a catastrophe, then stagnation in many economic sectors. There may be a stagnation of production and trade for a sufficiently long period of time, due to the displacement of European companies.

from the market by American ones. Europe could lose exports of fertilizers and grains from Russia and Ukraine, an increase in the cost of gas would hit European industry, making European goods expensive and unprofitable, and banning specific products would have a double impact on the economies of producer countries. All these factors will negatively affect the competitiveness of the prosperous European economies and allow the Russian economy to reach a new leading level of development.