Development of a scientifically grounded concept for managing the economic security of the region
Today, the development of a scientifically based concept of economic security management at the territorial level is facing serious difficulties. The generally accepted economic paradigm no longer makes it possible to effectively investigate, for example, such a socio-economic phenomenon as economic security. The evolution of methods of economic territorial research is influenced by the development of economic thought. The purpose of the study is to generalize the theoretical material on the research topic and to select the most promising modern paradigm concept of managing the economic security of the region. The author analyzes the problems of using the "Adam Smith" paradigm and draws conclusions about the expediency of using the evolutionary economic paradigm. This will allow, among other things, to consider the economic system of the region as self-developing. To develop an adequate concept of managing the economic security of the region, it is proposed to use the human-centered principle. As a result, the use of the quality of life of the population as an estimated indicator of the level of economic security of the region is yustified.
While nobody left any comments to this publication.
You can be first.
1. Blaug Mark (2004). Metodologya ekonomicheskoi nauki, ili Kak ekonomisty obyasnyayut. Transl. from Enlish. Nauch. red. i vstup. st. V.S. Avtonomova. M., NP «Zhurnal Voprosy ekonomiki», 416 p. (in Russian)
2. Vasil'kova V.V. (1999). Poryadok i khaos v razvitii sotsialnykh sistem: sinergetika i teorya sotsialnoy samoorganizacii. SPb., Lan', 480 p. (Mir kul'tury, istorii i filosofii) URL: http://www.phantastike.com/link/social_psychology/poryadok_i_ haos _v _ razvitii_ soc.zip. (in Russian)
3. Granberg A.G. (2000). Osnovy regional'noy ekonomiki. M., GU VShJe, – 584 p. (in Russian)
4. Kardash V.A. O neizbezhnoy smene paradigmy v ekonomicheskoi nauke (2009). Eekonomichesky vestnik Rostovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Vol.7, 1: 51–57. (in Russian)
5. Kirdina S.G. (2007). Modeli ekonomiki v raznyh paradigmah: neoklassicheskoy, neinstitucional'noy, evolyucionnoy i samoorganizacionnoy. URL: https://refdb.ru/look/2612759-pall.html. (in Russian)
6. Kun T. (1977). Struktura nauchnyh revolyutsy. 2-e izd. Transl. from EnglishI.Z. Naletova; obshh. red. D. Mikulenskogo. M., Progress, 300 p. Pp. 129-187. URL: http://www.biometrica.tomsk.ru/Kuhn.pdf. (in Russian)
7. Martishin E.M. (2011). Sovremennye ekonomicheskie paradigmy i razvitie ekonomicheskoi teorii. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/sovremennye-ekonomicheskie-paradigmy-i-razvitie-ekonomicheskoy-teorii/viewer. (in Russian)
8. Novejshy filosofsky slovar'. (2001). Sost. i gl. nauch. red. A.A. Gricanov. Minsk, Interpresservis, Kn. Dom, 1279 s. URL: http://www.philosophy.ru/edu/ref /slvrm.htm. (in Russian)
9. Popper K. (1983). Logika i rost nauchnogo znanya: izbr. raboty. Pod red. V.N. Sadovskogo. M., Progress, 605 p. (in Russian)
10. Romashhenko T.D. (2003). Ekonomicheskaya bezopasnost' natsional’nogo hozyaistva: teorya, metodologya, vosproizvodstvo: dis. …d-ra ekon. nauk. Voronezh, 327 p. (in Russian)
11. Savel'ev M.Yu. (2015). Metodologicheskoe issledovanie paradigm ekonomicheskoi i upravlencheskoy nauki. Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta. T. 25, vyp. 6 (ch. 2) Ekonomika i pravo: 50–57. (in Russian)
12. Feofilova T.Yu., Bol'shakov S.N. (2014). Teorya i metodologya ekonomicheskoi bezopasnosti v regional'nom kontekste: monografya. Syktyvkar, GOU VO KRAGSiU, 293 p. (in Russian)
13. Hodzhson Dzh. (2003). Ekonomicheskaya teorya i instituty: Manifest sovremennoy institucional'noy ekonomicheskoi teorii. Transl. from English– M.: Delo, 464 p. (in Russian)
14. Chernikov T.S. (2013). Metodologicheskoe znachenie nauchnoy paradigmy dlya istorii razvitya ekonomicheskoi teorii. Ekonomicheskie nauki, 8(105). Ekonomicheskaya teorya: 49–53. (in Russian)
15. Shabanova M.A. (2007). Socioekonomika i sotsial'no-ekonomicheskaya politika. Ekonomicheskaya nauka sovremennoy Rossii, 3 (38): 178. (in Russian)
16. Shurgalina I.N. (1997). Reformirovanie rossyskoy ekonomiki. Opyt analiza v svete teorii katastrof. M., ROSSPJeN, 221 p. (in Russian)
17. Ekonomicheskaya teorya na poroge XXI veka. (1998). Pod red. Yu.M. Osipova, V.T. Pulyaeva, V.T. Ryazanova, E.S. Zotovoy. M., Yurist#, 768 p. (in Russian)
18. Lakatos I. (1970). Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. URL: https://gtmarket.ru/library/basis/4369.
19. 2002). Darwinism in Economics: From Analogy to Ontology. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Vol. 12, Issue 3: 259–281.
20. 2007). Heuristic Twists and Ontological Creeds – A Road Map for Evolutionary Economics. Max Planck Institute of Economics. The Papers on Economics and Evolution.
Available at: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/31842/1/543493180.pdf.